Homeowner's Blog

A Plan to Provide Broadband to all Americans

Many rural and other homeowners either do not have access to broadband or don't have Internet access at fast enough speeds and affordable costs to support home-based businesses or sophisticated healthcare applications that would allow them to remain in their homes instead of moving to nursing facilities. Chairman Genachowski  and the staff of the Federal Communications Commission have developed a proposed National Broadband Plan for dramatically improving broadband networks and extending their benefits to all Americans. In terms of the practical impact of technology on the daily lives of most Americans, this effort far surpasses the importance of the space program other technology-related areas. As Chairman Genachowski noted, "The starting point to solve these problems is a set of goals that are ambitious but achievable with a national commitment."

The proposed National Broadband Plan is the first step to reaching a common agreement on the specifics and priorities of those goals. Once we reach a consensus on the goals, we will face significant challenges regarding the mechanics of its implementation. Those challenges will involve complicated decisions between alternative ways to achieve the nation's broadband goals. Policymakers will have to make those tough choices, but the Plan is the critical precursor to the day when all American homeowners and other consumers can fully realize the benefits of broadband.

Chairman Genachowski  and the staff of the Federal Communications Commission deserve our thanks for taking this first step.

Don't Tax Internet Purchases

Colorado last week joined a growing list of states that are expanding Internet sales tax collection. North Carolina and Rhode Island last year passed similar laws. We sympathize with the need of many states to raise money in this troubled economy, but state lawmakers have no business promoting the collection of a tax so widely disliked by their constituents. According to a Parade Magazine reader survey, 85% of consumers oppose sales taxes on Internet sales. Not that consumers are big fans of new taxes, but surveys show consumers are much less opposed to other types of taxes if necessary to plug budget gaps. By substantial margins they prefer alternatives such as higher sin taxes, income surtaxes on the wealthy, etc. to address budget shortfalls. In addition, taxes on alcohol and tobacco tend to discourage behavior that is very costly to society, and U.S. taxes on the wealthy, thanks to a series of tax cuts over the last half century, are among the lowest among the developed countries.

Sales tax collection on Internet purchases should not be expanded. It should be repealed. More and more consumers have their yard sales on Amazon, EBay, and Craig's list. If we apply sales tax to virtual garage sales, the next logical step will be to require that consumers collect sales taxes on real garage sales. Other consumers, including those pinched by the economy and low income consumers, are saving substantial amounts of money by purchasing second hand and heavily discounted items on the Internet, so Internet sales taxes discriminates against lower income consumers..

E-commerce helps the environment in several ways. Odd items (and sometimes really, really odd items) that might otherwise end up in a landfill, find a home with a consumer in another state who always wanted one of those. E-commerce also saves a lot of gas and wear and tear on our transportation infrastructure, and reduces traffic jams. Instead of individually driving their vehicles to the mall, the UPS or FedEx trucks, or your postal carrier can drop off your purchases, and they go down your street every day anyway.  

An e-commerce state sales tax exemption would be consistent with other sales tax exemptions for worthy purposes (back to school sales tax holidays, sales tax exemptions on prescription drugs, etc.). State legislators should consider the wishes of their constituents and repeal sales tax collections on Internet purchases. They should pursue alternative sources of revenue more palatable to their constituents if the state needs additional funds.

How to Fix the Financial System

Congress is considering financial-system-overhaul legislation. Right now there are no laws in to prevent another financial meltdown. It's clear that major reform is necessary. The problems are complex, and there are many complicated proposals out there. Sometimes someone comes up with a fairly simple solution to a complicated problem.  One of them came from the famous investor and "Oracle of Omaha" Warren Buffet. His recent suggestion: "In my view a board of directors of a huge financial institution is derelict if it does not insist that its CEO bear full responsibility for risk control," Buffett wrote. "If he's incapable of handling that job, he should look for other employment. And if he fails at it -- with the government thereupon required to step in with funds or guarantees -- the financial consequences for him and his board should be severe."

Buffet's concept can be formalized in federal legislation by requiring that the CEO and any other senior staff or board members who had been active proponents of the company's irresponsible policies be asked to seek new career opportunities elsewhere as a precondition for future federal bailouts of companies that substantially contributed to the financial crisis. This policy should provide for an orderly executive transition, and it should not apply to any employees or board members who weren't involved in the decision making process regarding these policies, or who only provided staff support. In most of the offending companies, you would be talking about only a small handful of employees, and in the last crisis probably only in the low hundreds.

Creating a career hazard for those who created the current moral hazard in the financial services sector would discourage their successors and potential imitators from such  choices in the future.